POLICY FOR SUBMISSION
OF FROZEN SECTIONS.
DRAFT COPY ONLY.
(Procedure 24).
http://www.netautopsy.org/axsop/axsop024.htm


NEXT PAGE
PREVIOUS PAGE
RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

United States Government Work, uncopyrighted, public-domain, DRAFT COPY ONLY. This document does not necessarily represent the views or policies of any United States Government agency. This document is provided "as is", without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including but not limited to the warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and non-infringement. In no event shall the authors be liable for any claim, damages or other liability, whether in an action of contract, tort or otherwise, arising from, out of, or in connection with the document or the use or other dealings made with the document.

See also: Frozen section policies: 25, 26, 27, 41, 86.



PRINCIPLE OF THE TEST.

Frozen sections are special consultations, provided by pathologists for intraoperative guidance.



SPECIMEN REQUIRED.

      All fresh human tissue excised at surgery, along with a filled-out Tissue Examination Form (U. S. Standard Form 515, USSF515), with a request for frozen section on the form, and personally handed to a histology technician, a resident, or an attending pathologist, The specimen may be frozen or occasionally examined grossly only, and submitted for permanent (see #9).



REAGENTS, INSTRUMENTATION.

      OCT Compound. Cryostat. Frozen section solutions for hematoxylin and eosin staining.



STEP-BY-STEP DESCRIPTION.


1. Frozen sections are special consultations, provided by pathologists to provide intraoperative guidance to surgeons. Because cryostat sections are inferior to permanent sections, frozen section diagnoses are not considered the final diagnosis for a specimen.

2. In the best of departments, there will be an irreducible number of instances where the report given for the frozen section will turn out to be incorrect when reviewed on the permanent section. Published values for such discrepancies are up to 5%. We perform frozen sections with the understanding that the surgeon, aware of these inherent limitations, wants our best judgment in order to make a necessary intraoperative clinical decision.

3. The histology laboratory, Room 4D-124, is the normal place of delivery for all surgical specimens during working hours, 8:00 AM through 4:30 PM. Before a frozen section is submitted, the histology laboratory (ext 5359) should be notified, by telephone or intercom, that a specimen will be arriving at a specified, estimated time.

4. All specimens requiring urgent attention should be personally handed to a histology technician, a resident, or an attending pathologist, with the statement that this is an urgent, intraoperative consultation. If an operation started during the day is likely to require frozen sections after 4:30 PM, then the on-call anatomic pathologist should be notified before 4:30 PM.

5. An anatomic pathologist is on-call at all times, and the on-call schedule is posted monthly with the paging operator. After hours, the on-call pathologist should be notified at least an hour before the frozen section will arrive in pathology, if at all possible.

6. All these procedures are discussed in this on-line Surgical Pathology Manual for the Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Service (Procedures 24, 25) which can be viewed by all staff persons on the Baltimore-VAMHCS intranet at URL:
http://vaww.vamhcs.med.va.gov
Click on DEPARTMENTS AND SERVICES.
Click on PATHOLOGY AND LABORATORY SERVICE.
Click on SURGICAL PATHOLOGY AND CYTOPATHOLOGY.
Click on TABLE OF CONTENTS.


7. The frozen section should be submitted fresh in a properly identified container, along with the carbon copy of the SF-515 form that will eventually accompany the final specimen. In most cases, this SF-515 form will be computer-generated in the operating room.

8. Instructions to the pathologist (often in the form of a diagram orienting the pathologist to the specimen) should be clear. The pathologist reviews the request, and decides whether a frozen section should be performed. In most instances, the pathologist complies with the request of the surgeon.

9. In a small percentage of cases, the pathologist may wish to question the type of frozen section requested , or even the need to perform a frozen section. The pathologist will always call the Operating Room to discuss frozen sections when there is some problem in complying with the consultation request. Operating Room personnel must be aware that circumstances may limit the ability of the pathologist to comply with a particular frozen section request. In the appropriate clinicopathologic circumstances, the specimen may be examined grossly only and submitted for permanent section. These circumstances include, but are not limited to: margins on a pigmented skin lesion or an ovarian cyst. The surgeon should be prepared to discuss these problems with the pathologist when they arise.

10. As the patient chart does not accompany the frozen section request, the pathologist relies heavily upon the clinical information supplied on the frozen section submission form for guidance. However, because potentially infectious cases may arrive as frozen section submissions without any biohazard warning and without any mention in the clinical history contained on the submission sheet, the pathologist may elect to check on the patient's infectious status, searching the VistA® computer system for the results of HIV, hepatitis, or any other test deemed relevant by the pathologist. Further, the pathologist may elect to read the clinical notes provided in the VISTA computer system. The pathologist may elect to pursue this type of review prior to processing the tissue, especially if the pathologist determines that the results of the review may abort the frozen section or provide information that directs the pathologist to pursue alternate forms of intraoperative consultation (particularly smear diagnosis).

11. It is important for optimal patient care to provide a frozen section diagnosis in a timely manner. The pathology department can usually provide a frozen section diagnosis for each tissue-block within 20 minutes of receipt of the specimen. The time required to deliver the specimen to us from the Operating Room is not under control of the surgical pathology section, and can add appreciably to the overall response time on a frozen section. The pathologist notifies the Operating Room by intercom of the diagnosis as soon as possible after it is rendered. To assist in expeditious processing of large or complicated specimens, the surgeon should orient the specimen with ink or sutures, and either accompany the specimen to the pathology area, or provide written orientation information on the Tissue Examination Form. In cases where the specimen exceeds 1 cm, representative areas-of-interest should be indicated; otherwise, the diagnosis may be delayed. Surgeons are always welcome to join the pathologist at the microscope in the anatomic pathology signout room, 4D-139, for additional consultation.

12. The pathologist will first confirm that he has contacted the appropriate Operating Room, by stating the patient's name and full social security number. After the pathologist reads the patient's name, full social security number, and diagnosis, the surgeon should acknowledge that he has heard the diagnosis. The surgeon's acknowledgment is recorded on the Tissue Examination Form by the pathologist, by stating: DIAGNOSIS xxx READ TO DR. xxx IN O.R. xxx AT DATE/TIME, AND READ BACK. The frozen section report, including a statement of the surgeon's acknowledgment, is included as an addendum to the Gross Description section of the surgical pathology report, and becomes part of the patient's permanent medical record.

13. FROZEN SECTION TURNAROUND TIME PILOT STUDY. A Frozen Section Turnaround time pilot study was performed for the period March 1, 2001, through December 31, 2001. During this time, there were 360 frozen section reports recorded in the frozen section. In the same period, there were 4,134 cases from year 2000 and 4,920 cases from year 2001. Thus, frozen section reports were issued for 4% of cases. For a single case (0.3%), the report was available only after 22 minutes of receiving tissue from the operating room.



REFERENCES.


1. Smith-Zagone MJ, Schwartz MR.
Frozen section of skin specimens.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005 Dec;129(12):1536-43.
PMID: 16329726
PubMed Entry

2. Marchevsky AM, Changsri C, Gupta I, Fuller C, Houck W, McKenna RJ Jr.
Frozen section diagnoses of small pulmonary nodules: accuracy and clinical implications.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Nov;78(5):1755-1759. Review.
PMID: 15511468.
PubMed Entry

3. Gu M, Lin F.
Efficacy of cone biopsy of the uterine cervix during frozen section for the evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2004 Sep;122(3):383-388.
PMID: 15362368.
PubMed Entry

4. Zitelli JA.
Accuracy of en face frozen sections for diagnosing margin status in melanocytic lesions.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2004 Jun;121(6):937-938; author reply 938-939.
PMID: 15198365.
PubMed Entry

5. Pan CC.
Postoperative frozen section?
Am J Clin Pathol. 2004 May;121(5):768; author reply 769-770.
PMID: 15151218.
PubMed Entry

6. Rosai J.
Rosai and Ackerman's Surgical Pathology. Ninth Edition.
St Louis: C.V. Mosby. 2004;:.
ISBN: 0323013422, 3080 pages.

7. Mills SE, Carter D, Greenson JK, Oberman HA, Reuter VE, Stoler MH, eds.
Sternberg's Diagnostic Surgical Pathology. Fourth Edition.
New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2004;:.
ISBN: 0781740517, 3089 pages.

8. Prieto VG, Argenyi ZB, Barnhill RL, Duray PH, Elenitsas R, From L, Guitart J, Horenstein MG, Ming ME, Piepkorn MW, Rabkin MS, Reed JA, Selim MA, Trotter MJ, Johnson MM, Shea CR.
Are en face frozen sections accurate for diagnosing margin status in melanocytic lesions?
Am J Clin Pathol. 2003 Aug;120(2):203-208.
PMID: 12931550.
PubMed Entry

9. Shiozawa M, Kawamoto M, Ishiwa N, Rino Y, Takanashi Y, Nakatani Y, Inayama Y, Imada T.
Clinical usefulness of intraoperative sentinel-node biopsy in gastric cancer.
Hepatogastroenterology. 2003 Jul-Aug;50(52):1187-1189.
PMID: 12846011.
PubMed Entry

10. Dosen D, Turic M, Smalcelj J, Janusic R, Grgic MP, Separovic V.
The value of frozen section in intraoperative surgical management of thyroid follicular carcinoma.
Head Neck. 2003 Jul;25(7):521-528.
PMID: 12808654.
PubMed Entry

11. Manstein ME, Manstein CH, Smith R.
How accurate is frozen section for skin cancers?
Ann Plast Surg. 2003 Jun;50(6):607-609.
PMID: 12783011.
PubMed Entry

12. Ribeiro NF, Godden DR, Wilson GE, Butterworth DM, Woodwards RT.
Do frozen sections help achieve adequate surgical margins in the resection of oral carcinoma?
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Apr;32(2):152-158.
PMID: 12729775.
PubMed Entry

13. Bretelle F, Agostini A, Rojat-Habib MC, Cravello L, Roger V, Blanc B.
The role of frozen section examination of conisations in the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
BJOG. 2003 Apr;110(4):364-370.
PMID: 12699797.
PubMed Entry

14. Reitsamer R, Peintinger F, Prokop E, Menzel C, Cimpoca W, Rettenbacher L.
Sentinel lymph node biopsy alone without axillary lymph node dissection -- follow up of sentinel lymph node negative breast cancer patients.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003 Apr;29(3):221-223.
PMID: 12657230.
PubMed Entry

15. Carlini M, Carboni F, Petric M, Santoro R, Guadagni F,
Marandino F, Castelli M, Santoro E.
Sentinel node in gastric cancer surgery.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2002 Dec;21(4):469-473.
PMID: 12636091.
PubMed Entry

16. Ohta T, Kitagawa H, Kayahara M, Kinami S, Ninomiya I, Fushida S, Fujimura T, Nishimura G, Shimizu K, Yi S, Miwa K.
Sentinel lymph node navigation surgery for pancreatic head cancers.
Oncol Rep. 2003 Mar-Apr;10(2):315-319.
PMID: 12579265.
PubMed Entry

17. Elo J, Balatoni Z, Kotai Z, Bartfai R.
Considerations in the Treatment of the Node-negative (N0) Neck in Glottic Carcinomas.
Pathol Oncol Res. 2002;8(4):257-61. Epub 2003 Feb 11.
PMID: 12579212.
PubMed Entry

18. Lane JE, Peterson CM, Ratz JL.
Letter to the editor: modified Mohs technique for Basal cell carcinomas of the head and neck.
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003 Jan-Feb;5(1):116.
PMID: 12533154.
PubMed Entry

19. Zarbo RJ, Nakhleh RE, Walsh M; Quality Practices Committee, College of American Pathologists.
Customer satisfaction in anatomic pathology.
A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 3065 physician surveys from 94 laboratories.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003 Jan;127(1):23-29.
PMID: 12521362.
PubMed Entry

20. Abboud B, Allam S, Chacra LA, Ingea H, Tohme C, Farah P.
Use of fine-needle aspiration cytology and frozen section in the management of nodular goiters.
Head Neck. 2003 Jan;25(1):32-36.
PMID: 12478541.
PubMed Entry

21. Civantos FJ, Gomez C, Duque C, Pedroso F, Goodwin WJ, Weed DT, Arnold D, Moffat F.
Sentinel node biopsy in oral cavity cancer: correlation with PET scan and immunohistochemistry.
Head Neck. 2003 Jan;25(1):1-9.
PMID: 12478537.
PubMed Entry

22. Bienert TN, Trotter MJ, Arlette JP. Related Articles, Links
Treatment of cutaneous melanoma of the face by Mohs micrographic surgery.
J Cutan Med Surg. 2003 Jan-Feb;7(1):25-30. Epub 2002 Nov 27.
PMID: 12447624.
PubMed Entry

23. Richards ML, Chisholm R, Bruder JM, Strodel WE.
Is thyroid frozen section too much for too little?
Am J Surg. 2002 Dec;184(6):510-514; discussion 514.
PMID: 12488150.
PubMed Entry

24. Shidham VB, Asma Z, Rao RN, Chavan A, Machhi J, Almagro U, Komorowski RA.
Intraoperative cytology increases the diagnostic accuracy of frozen sections for the confirmation of various tissues in the parathyroid region.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2002 Dec;118(6):895-902.
PMID: 12472283.
PubMed Entry

25. Solomon AC, Kossev PM. Related Articles, Links
Frozen sections in hematopathology.
Semin Diagn Pathol. 2002 Nov;19(4):255-262. Review.
PMID: 12469792.
PubMed Entry

26. Acs G.
Intraoperative consultation in gynecologic pathology.
Semin Diagn Pathol. 2002 Nov;19(4):237-254. Review.
PMID: 12469791.
PubMed Entry

27. Acs G, Baloch ZW, LiVolsi VA.
Intraoperative consultation: an historical perspective.
Semin Diagn Pathol. 2002 Nov;19(4):190-191. Review.
PMID: 12469786.
PubMed Entry

28. Vallancien G, Abou El Fettouh H, Cathelineau X, Baumert H, Fromont G, Guillonneau B.
Cystectomy with prostate sparing for bladder cancer in 100 patients: 10-year experience.
J Urol. 2002 Dec;168(6):2413-2417.
PMID: 12441929.
PubMed Entry

29. Wong VA, Marshall JA, Whitehead KJ, Williamson RM, Sullivan TJ.
Management of periocular basal cell carcinoma with modified en face frozen section controlled excision.
Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Nov;18(6):430-435.
PMID: 12439056.
PubMed Entry

30. Shiver SA, Creager AJ, Geisinger K, Perrier ND, Shen P, Levine EA.
Intraoperative analysis of sentinel lymph nodes by imprint cytology for cancer of the breast.
Am J Surg. 2002 Nov;184(5):424-427.
PMID: 12433606.
PubMed Entry

31. Creager AJ, Geisinger KR, Shiver SA, Perrier ND, Shen P, Ann Shaw J, Young PR, Levine EA.
Intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes for metastatic breast carcinoma by imprint cytology.
Mod Pathol. 2002 Nov;15(11):1140-1147.
PMID: 12429792.
PubMed Entry

32. Bitterman A, Bleicher RJ, Cabot MC, Liu YY, Giuliano AE.
Sentinel lymphadenectomy: a new alternative for managing early breast cancer.
Isr Med Assoc J. 2002 Oct;4(10):803-809. Review.
PMID: 12389345.
PubMed Entry

33. Carucci JA.
Mohs' micrographic surgery for the treatment of melanoma.
Dermatol Clin. 2002 Oct;20(4):701-708. Review.
PMID: 12380056.
PubMed Entry

34. Duek SD, Goldenberg D, Linn S, Krausz MM, Hershko DD.
The role of fine-needle aspiration and intraoperative frozen section in the surgical management of solitary thyroid nodules.
Surg Today. 2002;32(10):857-861.
PMID: 12376780.
PubMed Entry

35. Cioc AM, Ellison EC, Proca DM, Lucas JG, Frankel WL.
Frozen section diagnosis of pancreatic lesions.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002 Oct;126(10):1169-1173.
PMID: 12296752
PubMed Entry

36. Aas IH.
Telemedicine and changes in the distribution of tasks between levels of care.
J Telemed Telecare. 2002;8 Suppl 2:1-2.
PMID: 12217112.
PubMed Entry

37. Cheng MS, Morgan JL, Serpell JW.
Does frozen section have a role in the intraoperative management of thyroid nodules?
ANZ J Surg. 2002 Aug;72(8):570-572.
PMID: 12190731.
PubMed Entry

38. Albertini JG, Elston DM, Libow LF, Smith SB, Farley MF.
Mohs micrographic surgery for melanoma: a case series, a comparative study of immunostains, an informative case report, and a unique mapping technique.
Dermatol Surg. 2002 Aug;28(8):656-665.
PMID: 12174054.
PubMed Entry

39. Finn S, Toner M, Timon C.
The node-negative neck: accuracy of clinical intraoperative lymph node assessment for metastatic disease in head and neck cancer.
Laryngoscope. 2002 Apr;112(4):630-633.
PMID: 12150514.
PubMed Entry

40. Zerwes FP, Frasson AL, Gutfilen B, Barbosa da Fonseca LM.
Identification of sentinel node in breast cancer.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2002 Jun;21(2):155-158.
PMID: 12148570.
PubMed Entry

41. Cooley ML, Hoffman HT, Robinson RA.
Discrepancies in frozen section mucosal margin tissue in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
Head Neck. 2002 Mar;24(3):262-267.
PMID: 11891958.
PubMed Entry

42. Troxel DB.
Diagnostic pitfalls in surgical pathology -- discovered by a review of malpractice claims.
Int J Surg Pathol. 2001 Apr;9(2):133-136.
PMID: 11484501.
PubMed Entry

43. Moore GW, Berman JJ.
Anatomic Pathology Data Mining.
Chapter 4. In: Cios KJ. Medical Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. Berlin: Springer Verlag. 2000;4:61-107.
ISBN: 3-7908-1340-0, 502 pages.
Published within the series: "Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing", Physica-Verlag Heidelberg, a Springer-Verlag Company.
Full text of article: http://www.netautopsy.org/apdmchap.htm

44. Prophet EB, Mills B, Arrington JB, Sobin LH.
Laboratory Methods in Histotechnology, pp. 67-70.
1992: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC. 20306-6000.
ISBN: 1-881041-00-X 1992.